Same-Day Discharge Among Patients With Obesity Undergoing Laparoscopic Gynaecologic Oncology Surgery.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the likelihood of same-day discharge (SDD) among patients with obesity undergoing laparoscopic gynaecologic oncology surgery and identify predictors of SDD. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of gynaecologic oncology patients who underwent laparoscopic procedures between January 2012 and June 2016. Patients were categorized as non-obese, obese class I/II and obese class III (BMI <30, 30-39.9, and ≥40 kg/m2, respectively). We used univariate and multivariable logistic regression to identify variables associated with SDD. RESULTS: Of 496 patients, 288 were non-obese, 161 were obese class I/II, and 47 were obese class III. Overall, 182 patients (36.7%) were discharged same day; 44% of these were non-obese, 30% class I/II and 15% class III. On multivariable analysis, we found negative predictors for SDD to be obesity (OR 0.54; P = 0.03), procedure length (OR 0.51; P < 0.01), and higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (OR 0.63; P < 0.01), while we found being pre-booked for SDD (OR 9.16; P <0.01) was a positive predictor of SDD. Among all patients with obesity, only procedure length (OR 0.47; P < 0.01) and being pre-booked for SDD (OR 9.67; P < 0.01) were associated with SDD when we controlled for BMI, ASA score, intraoperative complications, type of surgery, and surgical start time. Patients discharged same day were less likely to present to the emergency department within 30 days of surgery (OR 0.48; P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Among the study cohort and after controlling for potential confounders, women with class I, II, and III obesity had a much lower likelihood of SDD than non-obese women. The only significant predictors of SDD among patients with obesity were duration of procedure and pre-booking for SDD. Further study is needed to identify strategies to improve SDD rates among patients with obesity.

Melanoma of the Vulva and Vagina: Surgical Management and Outcomes Based on a Clinicopathologic Reviewof 68 Cases.

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to evaluate the clinicopathologic features, surgical management, and survival of patients over 12 years at two academic centres. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with vulvar or vaginal melanoma between 2002 and 2014 were identified through pathology databases. Clinical and pathologic data were extracted from the medical records. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate recurrence-free survival and overall survival (OS), and univariate analyses using a Cox proportional hazard model were used to detect covariates related to survival. RESULTS: Patients with vulvar melanoma were more likely to undergo surgical excision (84.0% vs. 55.6%, P = 0.0243) and were more likely to achieve negative margins (70.0% vs. 16.7%, P < 0.0001). Forty-eight percent of patients with vulvar melanoma had a lymph node evaluation; sentinel node biopsies were performed in 32%. Actuarial median OS for vulvar melanoma was 45 months compared with 10.48 months for vaginal melanoma. A subset of 10 patients with vulvar melanoma who survived longer than 60 months was identified. Eight significant predictors of OS were demonstrated for vulvar melanomas: clinical stage, maximum tumour size, tumour thickness, lymphovascular space invasion status, clinically enlarged lymph nodes, sentinel lymph nodes, lymph node status, and radiation treatment. Patients with positive or indeterminate margin status demonstrated a higher risk of recurrence than did patients with negative margins (hazard ratio 2.60; 95% CI 1.14-5.90). CONCLUSION: Surgical excision with adequate margins is the mainstay of primary management when feasible. Lymph node evaluation, including sentinel nodes, may be considered in selected patients. Vulvar and vaginal sites differ markedly with respect to pathology, initial management, and survival, and they should be evaluated separately.

Predicting potential global distributions of two Miscanthus grasses: implications for horticulture, biofuel production, and biological invasions.

In many regions, large proportions of the naturalized and invasive non-native floras were originally introduced deliberately by humans. Pest risk assessments are now used in many jurisdictions to regulate the importation of species and usually include an estimation of the potential distribution in the import area. Two species of Asian grass (Miscanthus sacchariflorus and M. sinensis) that were originally introduced to North America as ornamental plants have since escaped cultivation. These species and their hybrid offspring are now receiving attention for large-scale production as biofuel crops in North America and elsewhere. We evaluated their potential global climate suitability for cultivation and potential invasion using the niche model CLIMEX and evaluated the models' sensitivity to the parameter values. We then compared the sensitivity of projections of future climatically suitable area under two climate models and two emissions scenarios. The models indicate that the species have been introduced to most of the potential global climatically suitable areas in the northern but not the southern hemisphere. The more narrowly distributed species (M. sacchariflorus) is more sensitive to changes in model parameters, which could have implications for modelling species of conservation concern. Climate projections indicate likely contractions in potential range in the south, but expansions in the north, particularly in introduced areas where biomass production trials are under way. Climate sensitivity analysis shows that projections differ more between the selected climate change models than between the selected emissions scenarios. Local-scale assessments are required to overlay suitable habitat with climate projections to estimate areas of cultivation potential and invasion risk.